Your web browser is out of date.

Update your browser for better security, speed and to get the best experience on this website.

Update your browser
Advert

MBR implementation in California: the WRRF at San Luis Obispo

Created
Updated
A view across the top of the membrane tanks at SLO
Credit: Judd Water and Wastewater Consultants
Patrick McGrath and Simon Judd

Simon Judd (right, with Patrick McGrath, City of SLO) reports from a visit in October 2023 to the Water Resource Recovery Facility serving the City of San Luis Obispo in California

1. Background

The City of San Luis Obispo (SLO) Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) has a design mean flow capacity of 5.4 MGD (20.5 MLD), peaking at >20 MGD (>75 MLD) during storm flows. The facility collects wastewater from the City, California Polytechnic University, and the San Luis Obispo County airport. The treated effluent is discharged to the SLO Creek, with around ten percent currently being diverted for non-potable reuse.

The ongoing upgrading of the works from a classical activated sludge (CAS)-based treatment scheme to an MBR with downstream UV disinfection has presented challenges often encountered when new process technologies are being implemented at an established site with existing historical infrastructure. At the SLO WRRF, the activated sludge process tank and chlorine contact tank both date back to 1991, the primary clarifiers to 1941, two of the digesters to 1941 and 1951, and the original anaerobic digester to 1926. In all of these cases, the original concrete is in good order, such that both investment costs and environmental footprint can be reduced by reusing or repurposing these assets. Upgrading then becomes a matter of determining which of the assets can be employed in the modified treatment scheme.

2. Wastewater treatment

The upgraded full treatment scheme (Fig. 1) for the main wastewater flow at the site comprises:

  • Equalisation for ~2 days at the mean design flow rate of 5.4 MGD
  • Screening to 6 mm using multi-rake bar screens (Fig. 2), rated at 16 MGD (60 MLD)
  • Degritting using two duty-only rectangular detritor tanks (Fig. 3), fitted with Huber Coanda grit classifiers (Fig. 4) for grit recovery and washing, rated at 500 GPM (114 m3/h)
  • Dual 80 ft (24 m) diameter primary clarifiers (Fig. 5)
  • Fine screening to 2 mm using two duty/standby Ovivo rotary drum fine screens (Fig. 6)
  • Process biology based on:
    • a 250k gall (946 m3) anoxic zone, with sludge fed back from the membrane tank via the RAS channel at a recirculation ratio of ~3
    • four 25 m-long aeration lanes with a total active volume of 1.32 MG (5000 m3), fitted with FBDA disc diffusers fed with Aerzen GM50L rotary lobe blowers rated at 3885 SCFM (6235 Nm3/h) (Figs. 7−9)
  • Mixed liquor filtration in six membrane tanks, each fitted with six cassettes (4 full/2 flex) of 36 (flex) – 52 (full) ZW500 immersed hollow fibre modules (34.4 m2 membrane area)
  • Air scour provided by six Aerzen D62S rotary lobe blowers, one per train (Figs. 9−10)
  • Membrane CIP provided by hydrogen peroxide (30% stock solution) and citric acid (50%), with maintenance cleans applied twice-weekly and supplemented with quarterly recovery cleans
  • Disinfection through a bank of nine Wedeco LBX UV reactors, each fitted with 60 lamps (Fig. 11), and
  • Cooling to 22.5 °C using a bank of three evaporative heat exchangers (Fig. 12).

For some of the new process technologies, new equipment infrastructure has been required. This includes the membrane tanks, the UV disinfection units and the coolers.

Fig. 1. Schematic of the SLO WRRF treatment scheme
Fig. 1. Schematic of the SLO WRRF treatment scheme
Process Flow diagram of MBR at SLO WRRF
Fig. 2. Coarse (6 mm bar) screens Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 2. Coarse (6 mm bar) screens
Coarse screen (6 mm), SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 3. Detritor tank Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 3. Detritor tank
Detritor, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 4. A pair of grit classifiers/washers Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 4. A pair of grit classifiers/washers
Two grit classifiers/washers, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 5. Dual primary sedimentation tanks Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 5. Dual primary sedimentation tanks
Two primary sedimentation tanks, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 6. Dual fine (2 mm rotary) screens Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 6. Dual fine (2 mm rotary) screens
Rotary fine screens, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants

Fig 7. A short walk across the top of the process tanks, starting from the mixed liquor pumps at one end, San Luis Obispo WRRF

Fig. 8. The mixed liquor pumps Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 8. The mixed liquor pumps
Bank of mixed liquor pumps, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 9. The blowers: six membrane blowers (left) and four process blowers (right)
Fig. 9. The blowers: six membrane blowers (left) and four process blowers (right)
Membrane (left) and process (right) blowers, SLO WRRF
Fig. 10. The membrane module headers: air (above) and permeate (below) Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 10. The membrane module headers: air (above) and permeate (below)
Membrane tank headers, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 11. The seven UV banks and detail of an array of the 60 lamps per reactor Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 11. The seven UV banks and detail of an array of the 60 lamps per reactor
Bank of UV reactor vessels, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 12. The three evaporative coolers fitted to the treated effluent lines Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 12. The three evaporative coolers fitted to the treated effluent lines
Evaporative coolers, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants

3. Residuals management

Treatment of residuals (the primary and secondary waste sludge streams) is through anaerobic digestion (AD) in three tanks offering a total volume of 4921 m3 (Fig. 13). The biogas generated is fed to a 2G CHP engine via two conditioning units (Fig. 14). The resultant heat generated is used to pre-heat the sludge upstream of the AD using three spiral heat exchangers (Fig. 15). The AD digestate is then fed to either a screw press (Fig. 16) or a drying bed (Fig. 17).

The original 1920s digester tank has been repurposed as a biofilter for odour control. It is filled with GAC media which provides effective deodourisation of the combined vented streams from the headworks, primary clarifiers, screw press, and fine screens.

Fig 13. The three existing digester tanks, San Luis Obispo WRRF

Fig. 14a. CHP engine unit, internal Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 14a. CHP engine unit, internal
CHP unit, internal, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 14b. CHP engine unit, external (showing two gas conditioning vessels) Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 14b. CHP engine unit, external (showing two gas conditioning vessels)
CHP unit, external view, SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 15. Heat exchangers for pre-heating of sludge for downstream digestion Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 15. Heat exchangers for pre-heating of sludge for downstream digestion
Spiral heat exchangers at SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 16. Sludge screw press Credit: Judd Water and Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 16. Sludge screw press
Sludge screw pressCredit: Judd Water and Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 17. Sludge drying bed (foreground) with equalisation basin behind Credit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants
Fig. 17. Sludge drying bed (foreground) with equalisation basin behind
Sludge drying bed (foreground) and wastewater equlisation bassin (background), SLO WRRFCredit: Judd Water & Wastewater Consultants

4. Challenges

As with water and wastewater installations worldwide, SLO WRRF has been subject to the vagaries of inclement weather associated with climate change. One-in-a-hundred-year storms have visited the facility twice in the past five years, necessitating significant remedial efforts on both occasions. Storm protection measures at the site include raising the headworks by half a metre and doubling the EQ volume from 4.5m to 9m gallons. Additional storm protection measures include flood walls around the facility’s headworks and other components, and storm flow programming for coordinating pumps and valves for higher volumes.

A major challenge during the implementation was posed by the existing underground assets. The precise location of the pipes, some of which date back to 1941, had to be painstakingly logged and the new pipework designed and fitted without obstructing or fouling the existing assets. Moving forward, all new buried assets have been included in a BIM (building information model) of the facility; all pipes and duct banks include tracer wire for ease of location.

Solids handling, relating to sequencing and scheduling of the work, had resulted in septic conditions. These conditions impacted on both the treatment processes and the local community due to the generation of odour. This has been addressed through reconfiguring the existing systems and deploying mobile treatment skids to mitigate and remove septic solids. Temporary skids have included a dewatering skid for reducing sludge volumes prior to hauling off site, and a mobile odour scrubber.

The site staff have also come up with an ingenious solution to a familiar challenge at sites with established process technologies: the renewal of components or component parts for obsolete equipment. Rather than face the exorbitant costs and/or long lead times associated with ordering new items, the team have looked to repair the existing equipment by replacing the damaged part with a replica fabricated using a 3D printer. This has only been possible through developing the necessary specialist knowledge and skills in house, but has allowed the repair of obsolete equipment by replacing the affected component by designing and printing a copy within a matter of hours. Examples so far include a fan for a motor, a nozzle for a solenoid valve, and even models of Tardigrades for an outreach programme.

Whilst challenges have been faced in the implementation of the new technologies at the SLO WRRF, few of these have related directly to the MBR technology itself other than higher-than-expected levels of air in the permeate line and adapting the maintenance cleaning schedules from baseline recommendations. Issues have instead been associated with either unusual storm events or system integration issues such as communication and controls coordination with the ultraviolet disinfection system. Otherwise, since the commissioning of the MBR and UV plants in June 2023, staff have observed a significant improvement in the quality of water discharged to the San Luis Obispo creek and delivered across town as recycled water for irrigation.

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Chris Lehman and Patrick McGrath at SLO for their time, co-operation and patience in hosting our visit and responding to subsequent queries: it's always a real education to hear from people on the front line of implementation and commissioning.

About this page

'MBR implementation in California: the WRRF at San Luis Obispo' was written by Simon Judd

This page was last updated on 08 April 2024

Disclaimer

Information on this page may have been supplied by third parties. You are reminded to contact any third parties to confirm information is accurate, up to date and complete before acting upon it. TheMBRSite.com accepts no liability for information provided by third parties, actions taken on the basis of this information or information held on third-party websites.

© Text copyright Judd & Judd Ltd unless otherwise indicated on this page