Features - Membrane operation

The impact of biofouling on surface membrane properties in MBRs

MBR membranes are prone to fouling generally, and biofouling in particular, by organic matter originating from the microbial cells. These biofoulants vary in concentration with the activated sludge characteristics, such as the mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration and solids retention time (SRT) (and so the food/microorganism (F/M) ratio), as well as the feedwater chemistry.

view feature

Membrane operation | Process biology

Reducing process aeration energy consumption in MBRs

MBRs use more energy compared with classical activated sludge (CAS) because the aeration requirements are greater. Aeration is needed both for the biological and membrane tanks for degrading the organics and scouring the membrane respectively. Typically, aeration energy consumption accounts for 70–80% of total energy used for the municipal wastewater treatment process, with 40–60% consumed by the process biology.

view feature

Membrane operation | Process biology | Feasibility, optimisation and costs

Kunming Underground MBR: a Chinese case study

China features many of the largest municipal wastewater MBRs in the world. Apart from their capacity, some also are ambitious in their construction. The below-ground installation at Kunming City, commissioned in 2012, is one such example. At an ADF (average daily flow) capacity of 150,000 m3/d and a peak daily flow of 195,000 m3/d, it is a substantial plant.

view feature

Membrane operation | Feasibility, optimisation and costs | Pre-treatment and post-treatment | Water quality and treatability

MBR OPEX − the theory of running costs

Operational costs in MBRs are marginally higher than those of conventional activated sludge (CAS). Firstly, permeating water through a membrane demands energy. In the case of the immersed technologies (iMBRs) this means that the overall specific aeration demand (SAD) is higher, since air is needed both for maintaining the process biology in the aeration tank and scouring the immersed membrane.

view feature

Membrane operation | Process biology | Feasibility, optimisation and costs

Improving MBR flux: Ultrafiltration with a twist

In autumn 2015, after two years of research and development, Pentair brought to market its new ‘Helix’ product. An enhancement to X-Flow tubular membrane technology, Helix features a helically-winding ridge on the inside of the membrane which is designed to tackle cake build-up and enhance flux. The technology has so far been tested on both industrial effluents and municipal wastewater.

view feature

Membrane operation | Feasibility, optimisation and costs | Pre-treatment and post-treatment | Water quality and treatability

MBR Screening Part 2: Selecting an MBR screen

Key facets to take into account when selecting a screen for your MBR design include the screenings capture ratio, screen apertures, screening flow velocity, ancillary processes and coarse suspended solids, and screen maintenance. The screenings capture ratio (SCR) represents the amount of solids removed by the screen as a proportion of the total coarse solids load, and as such is analogous to membrane rejection.

view feature

Membrane operation | Pre-treatment and post-treatment