Cleaning up

17 December 2011

Simon Judd

Simon Judd

Author Bio

Simon Judd, author of The MBR Book, Watermaths, and Industrial MBRs, offers observations on membrane technology. Contact Simon at

Whilst the academic profession continues to find increasingly expensive analytical instrumentation and more protracted procedures for fractionating and identifying foulants in municipal MBRs, it’s left to the practitioners to come up with methods for tackling manifestation of fouling. Regardless of precisely which chemical species are responsible for fouling, the fact remains that sustaining permeability of an immersed MBR results from achieving that delicate balance between the flux, membrane air scouring and cleaning.

Given that the flux is determined by the flow (i.e. you get what you get) and the air scour rate is normally predetermined by the blower capacity, the operator’s toolbox is hardly replete with options. If the membrane is backflushable, then the possible benefit of modifying the physical cleaning cycle can studied. However, since it is the chemical clean that delivers the most significant permeability recovery, this is normally where attention is focused when it comes maintaining throughput. And if chemical cleaning proves ineffective, it’s normally because the membrane has become clogged.

At this point, the normal reaction from the supplier or consultant is for them to adopt the guise of a garage mechanic and suck the teeth, frown and shake the head murmuring: “ooh, I don’t think you wanted to do that”. However, it appears that there are an increasing number of options for declogging membranes – not necessarily demanding suiting up with goggles and Marigold gloves and setting about the module with a low-pressure hose.

Time was when Naston (now defunct) had a mobile cleaning tank into which complete flat sheet membrane cassettes could be immersed. Al Ansab in Oman is fitted with a dedicated cleaning tank for the same purpose. Now, a company in Bristol, UK, offers a flat sheet panel chemical cleaning service, which apparently restores heavily fouled and clogged membranes back to near-virgin condition ( Given that the membrane mechanical integrity appears to be pretty sound (Ayala et al, 2011,, this would seem to offer a means of getting the most out of the membranes, and marginally reducing the load on the UK’s burgeoning landfill sites.

So, one hopes that Dr Baker and his chums in Bristol successfully clean up in more than just one sense.

‘The MBR Site’ is a trading division of Judd and Judd Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 8082403.

Registered office: Suite 2, Douglas House, 32-34 Simpson Road, Fenny Stratford, Buckinghamshire, MK1 1BA, United Kingdom. Email:

Banner image: full treatment plant for pharmaceutical wastewater in Taizhou, Linhai Park, Zhejiang Province, China, including Shanghai MEGAVISION  flat sheet UF membrane modules in two MBR units. Image courtesy of VALORSABIO, Lda.

Image credits:

– Image for our Chinese largest plants 全球最大的MBR项目 homepage link: Image supplied by Apex Environmental
– Image for our Consultants and Contractors homepage link: Image supplied by Ovivo USA, LLC.

Disclaimer: The information given on this website is reproduced in good faith. No liability is accepted for errors or omissions. The MBR Site does not endorse any products, services, organisations, events or any other listing included in this site. You are strongly advised to check all information, including specifications and installation details, before acting on any information given in this website. The MBR Site links to third-party websites – note that we are not responsible for the content of third-party websites and third-party websites are visited at your own risk. Please read our terms and conditions and privacy policy. Use of this website indicates acceptance of these conditions.

This website is designed for modern browsers – if you have problems viewing our website, you may wish to upgrade your browser.